memescopev1.0
← back to track record

$PEPE

23.0
/100

Pepe · solana

❌ Avoid / Exit Liquidity Risk

Performance

Entered at
2026-06-13
Entry price
$0.0000124700
Current price
$0.0000100900
% move
-19.09%

Outcome: flat (settled 2026-06-20)

Score breakdown

Social2.0/10
KOL mentions, sentiment polarity, Twitter velocity
Smart Money1.0/10
Profitable wallets holding, fresh entries
Risk5.0/10
Liquidity lock, deployer holdings, audit checks
Virality3.0/10
Reach acceleration, share velocity
Momentum1.0/10
Volume curve, buy/sell ratio, trade size trend
Listing1.0/10
DEX depth, CEX listing probability
Risk is inverse — higher means safer.

Analyst memo

ANALYST MEMO · CLAUDE SONNET 4 6

Solana $PEPE clone with $4 in 24h volume against $111M liquidity — a near-dead token. Zero smart money, zero KOLs, unlocked liquidity, and no source code. This is not the real PEPE; it's a ghost token with no trading activity.

This token presents one of the most extreme volume-to-liquidity mismatches observable in on-chain data: $3.99 in 24-hour volume against over $111M in reported liquidity. This ratio is essentially impossible under normal market conditions and strongly suggests the liquidity figure is either fabricated, stale, or part of a deceptive display. No real price discovery is occurring here.

The GMGN signals confirm total abandonment by informed participants. Smart money holders sit at zero, KOL holders at zero, and hot level at zero. There is a single sniper holder, which may represent an early bot entry that has since gone cold. The creator is still holding (creator_hold status), which combined with zero community activity suggests no organic ecosystem has formed around this token.

On the positive side of the risk ledger: mint is renounced, freeze is renounced, no honeypot, no blacklist, no buy/sell tax, and bundler/rat trader rates are effectively zero. These are structurally clean signals. However, liquidity is explicitly not locked, the contract is not open source, and burn ratio is 0%. The combination of unlocked liquidity and a dormant creator holding position is a meaningful rug-risk vector.

The CoinGecko rank of 63 and the name 'Pepe' almost certainly refer to the Ethereum-native $PEPE, not this Solana contract. This token appears to be a name-squatting clone attempting to benefit from brand confusion. The market cap figure of $112M is almost certainly misleading given the near-zero trading activity.

Virality and momentum scores are floored. There is no cross-platform narrative, no meme momentum, no volume trend, and no buy pressure detectable. The 24h price change of -0.02% reflects not stability but complete illiquidity — the price isn't moving because nothing is trading.

Listing probability on any major exchange is negligible. This is a Solana clone of a well-known brand with no volume, no community, no smart money, and no open-source verification. No exchange would list this over the legitimate Ethereum PEPE.

In aggregate, this token fails on every actionable dimension. The only reason Risk doesn't score lower is the renounced authorities and clean tax structure — but those positives are overwhelmed by the dead trading activity, unlocked liquidity, and closed-source contract.

RED FLAGS · 8
  • Liquidity not provably locked - rug risk
  • 24h volume of ~$4 against $111M liquidity - near-zero real trading activity
  • Contract is not open source - cannot verify logic or hidden functions
  • Zero smart money holders and zero KOL holders - no informed participation
  • Creator still holding (creator_hold) with no community activity
  • Likely a name-squatting clone of Ethereum $PEPE - brand confusion risk
  • Reported market cap and liquidity figures appear inconsistent with actual trading volume
  • Burn ratio is 0% - no deflationary mechanism active
Generated by claude-sonnet-4-6 · Sat, 13 Jun 2026 12:00:59 GMT